Every line of code mine · 100M+ tokens through Claude Code
Nº 02 · Wake Tech → Chapel Hill · 2021 — 26
A full ride to UNC–Chapel Hill.
3.94 GPA · A.A., with honors · Fall 2026
Fullscholarship
Nº 03 · Lawn care · 2023 — 25
Built a business. Paid for college.
$300~$15,00050× · under two days
One man, every mower · It paid for community college
Nº 04 · MrBeast · 2022 — 23
1,943,000,000 views.1,943,000,000views.
Five credited videos · Counted August 2026
A personal historyNewest first
Still being written.
Chapter 01August 2026Kachieve · ECON 384
Creating tools for classmates.
Game theory starts this fall. I turned the reading into six hundred practice questions — then taught the app the one thing a textbook can’t do: break a question you can’t answer into questions you can.
The ECON 384 syllabus went up in August. I fed the readings to Kachieve and got five lessons back — 619 questions, written from the same chapters the class gets tested on.
Generating questions is the easy half. The half I care about is the button sitting under every one of them: Teach me. Press it when you’re stuck and the app doesn’t explain the answer at you. It writes a ladder.
It takes the question you missed and generates a run of easier ones leading back to it, each feeding the next. The first is a layup. The last is the question that stopped you, word for word. Nobody hands you the answer — you get walked to the point where you can produce it yourself.
Any question you can’t answer is just a stack of easier questions you can.
And if a rung is still too high, you press Teach me on the rung. It breaks that one down too, and the ladder grows a ladder. In my own database that has gone three levels deep.
A Kachieve class is one invite link — everyone studying the same material, out of the same lessons. That’s the argument for building it the month before the semester rather than the week after finals: when the class needs the thing, the link already exists.
Fig. 01The class page. Five lessons cut from one semester’s readings; the numbers are questions, not pages — 103, 163, 165, 119, 69.
Fig. 02A question, and the button that matters. Teach me sits there before you answer — you don’t have to get it wrong first to admit you’re lost.
Fig. 03The dive. While the ramp is being written the app narrates itself — reading what you said, finding the building blocks, sketching out the steps.
Fig. 04The ladder, first rung. The bar names the question you’re climbing back to and the dots are the rungs. All four plates are photographed from the live codebase, run on my own desk in August 2026.
The mechanic
Break it down.
One real breakdown, rung by rung — the questions the app actually wrote the moment I couldn’t define a game. Scroll to dive; keep scrolling to climb back out.
StuckDiving deeper…Finding the building blocksStill too high? Break that rung down tooBuilding up…Concept learned
Step 09
In game theory, what exactly is a “game”?
The question I couldn’t answer
Step 08
A political scientist studies how two rival parties choose campaign strategies, each depending on the other. He is building a —
Step 07
Which of the following is NOT a strategic interaction?
Step 06
A driver chooses a route to work. Traffic depends on which routes thousands of other drivers pick.
Step 05
An economist writes down assumptions about two countries choosing trade policies, where each country’s welfare depends on both choices.
Step 04
In the social sciences, a simplified representation of how people behave is called a —
Step 03
A hiker packs for a solo trip, checking the forecast. Nobody else’s decision affects her outcome. Is this a strategic interaction?
Step 02
A chess player’s best move depends on how her opponent will respond.
Step 01
Two firms decide whether to set prices high or low; each firm’s profit depends on what the other chooses.
Depth 2 · a rung of its own
Step 01
A wheat farmer decides how many acres to plant. Her revenue depends on a market price set by thousands of other growers.
The nine rungs are the real cards from one breakdown, trimmed to fit the page. The trick is the last one: Step 09 is the original question, re-served — so finishing the ladder and answering the thing that stopped you are the same act.
0questionsfive lessons, cut from one course’s readings
0rungswritten on demand, so far, for the 307 questions that stopped somebody
0levelsas deep as the recursion has actually had to go
What it’s teaching me
Build the thing you need, then hand out the link.
A tool you use yourself is the only kind worth giving away — and a class is the smallest room where that’s obviously true.
Chapter 02April 2026 — presentKachieve, still shipping
The next language.
Accounting was the language of business. AI is the language of whatever comes next — so I’m learning it the way I learn everything now: by building something real and keeping score.
A month after Conjugo — the Spanish app in the next chapter — Katie and I were building again. Kachieve is the app in the chapter above; this one is about what building it cost, and what it bought.
Upload your notes and they become practice problems that keep quizzing you until you actually know the material. Everything else — the ladders, the recursion, the class links — grew out of that one loop.
The concept is mine, and so is every line of code — I came up with it, prototyped it, and built it myself, putting more than a hundred million tokens through Claude Code across Kachieve and the side projects orbiting it. Learning AI was the point. Somewhere along those hundred million tokens, I got good.
You don’t learn a language by reading about it. You learn it by using it badly, daily, in public.
0M+tokens of Claude Code — the price of learning by building
0userstwenty‑seven accounts, minus the six that were me
~0hoursof real studying on the app — my own time excluded
As I write this, the dashboard says exactly one user is active today. Good. Every number I’ve ever cared about started out small and real — and I trust small and real over big and imagined, every time.
The app ships weekly. This chapter doesn’t get an ending yet.
What it’s teaching me
Small and real beats big and imagined.
Twenty‑one real users teach you more than a million imaginary ones — and a language only sticks if you use it every day.
Chapter 03March 2026yoconjugo.com
The language of people.
The journal in the next chapter shows fifteen hours for Spring 2026, and one line of it says intermediate Spanish. This is what studying for that class turned into.
In March 2026, between accounting problem sets and Spanish homework, I built Conjugo — a language app with one conviction at its core: technology should put two people face to face, not stand between them.
It had the serious machinery — spaced repetition on the same algorithm as Anki, AI‑written sentence cards read aloud in a synthesized native voice, a knowledge map covering all eighteen lessons of the Wake Tech Spanish curriculum. But the part I loved was the battles: head‑to‑head flashcard races over live video, and a matchmaking mode that paired you with a native Spanish speaker learning English. You teach yours, they teach theirs. Both people walk away better.
It started as a little script that stuffed AI‑generated sentences into my own Anki deck. Eleven days and eighty‑seven commits later, it was a real product at yoconjugo.com, with a team of four — my girlfriend Katie designed it, and two friends, Reece and Amos, ran marketing and translation. I wrote all of the code.
No AI tutor will ever replace a real conversation.
Fig. 05The practice desk. Decks due for review, and a rank ladder from Recruit to Master. The sidebar’s closing line: “You are one session away from a better you.”
Fig. 06A card, answered. You type the Spanish, it grades you, and the algorithm decides when you’ll see it again — in a minute, a day, or three.
Fig. 07Battles. Each player picks the words, then you race through the deck head‑to‑head — live video of your opponent in the corner, because the point was always the other person.
Fig. 08The knowledge map — the whole curriculum drawn as a trail. The server died when the semester ended; these photographs are the codebase, exhumed from GitHub and run again on my desk in August 2026.
0daysfrom first commit to a live product
0commitsevery one of them mine
0lessonsthe full Wake Tech Spanish curriculum, mapped
When the semester ended I stopped paying for the server, and yoconjugo.com went dark. Some projects end because they fail. This one ended because the next one started.
It stayed dark for five months — until the August night I wrote this chapter, when I pulled the code back off GitHub and gave it a corner of Kachieve’s server. It’s alive again at yoconjugo.com — no account, no gate. See for yourself.
What it taught me
The tool was never the point.
Conjugo’s whole thesis was that software should put two people face to face, not replace one of them. I still believe that — even now that I build with AI every day.
Chapter 042021 — 2026Wake Tech, then Chapel Hill
The language of business.
I went back to community college for a single accounting class. I left with a degree, honors, and a place at UNC–Chapel Hill.
College and I got off to a slow start. One summer term at nineteen, a C in precalculus — and then two years of not going back.
What pulled me back wasn’t a deadline. It was a sentence. Warren Buffett calls accounting the language of business — and I was running a business every day: pricing hours, flipping machines, watching money move. So in the fall of 2024 I re‑enrolled at Wake Tech for exactly one class, Principles of Financial Accounting.
I wanted to be fluent in the language I was encountering every day.
The recordWake Technical Community College · 2021 — 2026
credit hours
cumulative GPA
A.A.Associate in Arts, with honors
3 ×President’s List
1 ×Dean’s List
May 2026Degree conferred
The class did exactly what Buffett promised. Debits and credits turned out to be the grammar of everything I’d been doing by feel — the mower flips, the routes, the bushes. I came back for one class and stayed for a whole degree, paid for term by term by the lawn care business.
What I didn’t expect was to like it. Not the credential — the work. Reading things nobody assigned me, staying after class to argue about them, chasing a question for no better reason than that it was a good question.
Somewhere in the middle of it, I fell in love with academia.
The transferWhere the associate degree was pointed the whole time
FromWake TechAssociate in Arts, 2026
ToUNC–Chapel HillFall 2026
Fullscholarship
What it taught me
Nobody sent me back. That’s why it worked.
The first time, college was something I was supposed to do. The second time, it was a tool I picked up on purpose — and a tool you choose is one you actually use.
Chapter 052023 — 2025Lawn care, then a little more
Bigger wasn’t better.
Two years running a one‑man lawn care company. It paid for community college, and it quietly rewired how I think about money.
Fig. 09The original setup, early 2025. A Ranger, three Ferris stand‑ons, a Toro, a trailer — and a lot of overhead.
I started the way most people start: with the biggest truck I could justify and the most expensive equipment on the lot. It looked like a business. It felt like a business. It was also the least profitable version of the business I would ever run.
So I changed what I measured. Not revenue — profit per hour worked. Every decision after that came back to the same number: which machines to keep, which clients to let go, how to route a day so the truck spent less time on the road and more time earning.
Figs. 10 — 12The refined setup, spring 2025. Less equipment, tighter routes, better lawns.
0yearsrunning the business
0%of community college tuition, paid
Everymowersold for more than I paid — after a full season of use
Most operators treat mowers like an expense. I treated them like inventory. Buy right, maintain obsessively, sell at the right moment — and a year of hard use cost me nothing. That was the moment buying and selling stopped being a side hobby and became the thing I was actually good at.
Project · May — June 2025
A little alchemy
Toward the end, I stopped thinking like a landscaper and started thinking like an investor who happened to own a shovel. The question changed from what does this lawn need to what is the cheapest set of pieces that makes this property worth more than their sum?
01/05
01 · May 17 · Before
A brick ranch with good bones and empty beds. Solid house, zero curb appeal.
02 · May 30 · The find
A homeowner wanted a row of full‑grown shrubs gone. Most people pay to have that done. I offered to dig them out for free.
03 · May 30 · The haul
Dug, balled and loaded in a single afternoon. Mature plants, for the price of a shovel and a few hours.
04 · May 31 · Planting
Set, backfilled, mulched and edged the next morning.
05 · June 5 · After
Under two days of work. About three hundred dollars in materials. An estimated fifteen thousand added to the home’s sale value.
$0in materials
<0dayson site
~$0estimated value added
0×return on materials
It felt a little like alchemy — assembling pieces that cost almost nothing into something worth far more than their sum.
What it taught me
The most profitable version of a business is rarely the biggest one.
And value doesn’t live in the parts. It lives in knowing how to put them together.
Chapter 062022 — 2023A spreadsheet, then MrBeast
What makes things spread.
I taught myself why videos go viral — badly at first, then well enough that the biggest YouTuber on the planet paid for my ideas.
It started with a question I couldn’t put down: why does one video pull ten million views while a nearly identical one pulls ten thousand?
I went looking for patterns — thumbnails, titles, the first ten seconds, the promise a video makes and whether it keeps it — and I kept score in a spreadsheet. The spreadsheet, if I’m honest, sucked. The tools to build what I could see in my head didn’t exist yet. But the thinking underneath it held up, and it rewired how I watched everything.
I stopped watching videos and started watching what they did to people.
Contract · MrBeast · 2022 — 23
The credits
That way of seeing got me contract work with the biggest YouTuber on the planet. My job was ideas — take what I understood about psychology, virality and the algorithm, and turn it into videos built for a hundred million people. Five of the ones I worked on:
Idea work is strange: your fingerprints end up everywhere and nowhere. What I kept wasn’t a credit line — it was proof, at the largest scale there is, that attention follows rules.
The next thing I bought wasn’t a camera. It was a lawn mower.
What it taught me
Virality isn’t luck. It’s pattern recognition.
The spreadsheet was crude, and the question it asked was everything: why this and not that? I never stopped asking it.
Chapter 072021 — 2022Books, then an algorithm
What makes things move.
Right after high school I set out to start a quantitative trading firm. I read the books, I programmed the algorithm — and I ran straight into everything I didn’t know yet.
The first thing I ever studied on my own — nobody assigning it, nobody checking — was the stock market. I finished high school and fell into it completely.
The plan, and at nineteen it felt entirely reasonable, was a quantitative trading firm. So I read — dozens of books, one after another: the value investors, the macro traders, the market histories. The one that rewired me was Ray Dalio’s. He treats the world as a machine — the same causes producing the same effects, over and over, for anyone patient enough to map them. I believed him. I still do.
So I acted on it the only way I knew how: I taught myself just enough code to program a trading algorithm. That sentence is most of the triumph of this chapter. The firm never followed. Between my ideas and my abilities sat everything I hadn’t learned yet — real programming, real statistics, the slow fundamentals — and no amount of conviction could stand in for them.
The market didn’t look random to me. It looked like cause and effect, at scale.
Dozensof bookson markets — value, macro, and the people who beat them
0algorithmprogrammed, in code I was learning as I wrote it
0firmslaunched — this ledger keeps its zeros
Blueprint · 2022 · Never built
The machine I couldn’t build
If Dalio was right — if the world really is a machine of causes and effects — the lens didn’t have to stop at stocks. The next idea was a tool that mapped why things work: point it at any decision and it would show you the causes behind the winners, so that anyone could choose the way the best investors do. Three of the questions it was meant to answer:
NºThe questionDomain
01Where does a coffee shop actually work?Retail
02Which house on the street is underpriced — and why?Real estate
03Why does one video pull ten million views?Attention
“Everything” was the problem. I needed one arena where cause and effect kept score in public.
YouTube was that arena. Every experiment runs in the open, every outcome is a number anyone can read, and the machinery underneath — psychology, packaging, the promise a video makes — repeats exactly the way Dalio said causes do. I never built the tool; I didn’t have the hands for it yet, and this time I knew it.
So I did something smaller, and more honest. I opened a spreadsheet.
What it taught me
The ideas were never the problem. The fundamentals were.
At nineteen I wanted a firm before I could really program, and an edge before I knew statistics. Everything above this line is me going back for the fundamentals — on purpose, one language at a time.